.Google's Martin Splitt answered a concern in the s.e.o Workplace Hours podcast concerning whether recreating YouTube online video content in to message on a web page would be actually viewed as duplicate content as well as possess an unfavorable influence on the website ranks.Although duplicate web content is actually certainly not an adverse ranking aspect, content posted on a more reliable site may cause the information on the less reliable internet site to become outed perform. It's a legitimate question to talk to considering that information on an authoritative will definitely out perform the very same information on a much less authoritative one.Some in the search neighborhood describe one part of material appropriating the positions of yet another as 'cannibalization' of the web page's ranking ability. This is actually the issue of the individual asking the question.Google's Martin Splitt recounted the sent inquiry:." If I develop a YouTube online video and afterwards take that particular text message or even information as well as place it on a website, could Google banner that web page or web site for duplicate material?".Various Content Media Are Addressed As Different.Martin Splitt responded to that both types of information are various and are going to not be actually dealt with as the exact same content, thereby publishing text material extracted from an online video will certainly certainly not be looked at replicate web content.This is his solution:." Zero, one is an online video and the various other one is message content, and that would be actually distinct information!".Publishing Removed Text From Video.Martin praised the idea of removing message information coming from a video and also republishing it as content, noting that some people favor to consume information in text type rather than viewing a video. Reversing the circulation of material from content to sound or even video recording is probably not a bad suggestion additionally due to the fact that some people possess trouble reading through text material and may prefer listening to it coming from a video or even a podcast style.Martin talked about posting video recording content in a textual model:." It is actually additionally certainly not a bad tip, some users (like me) could choose a text version and also others may certainly not manage to use a video clip version of the content in the first place as a result of data transfer or even aesthetic restraints.".Takeaways.The tip responsible for the question is actually repurposing information and it's a great tip. Look is actually greater than Google, it's also YouTube and wherever individuals receive their audio information, like Spotify. The fact that there is no cannibalization of the web content between mediums produces repurposing a feasible approach to extending your content range.Listen closely to the podcast at the 8:20 minute score:.Included Photo through Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.